For product teams
Find QA risks before they hit production
We audit your QA process, critical product flows, API risks, automation setup, and release readiness - then give you a practical improvement plan your team can execute.
Main offer
QA Audit Sprint
Process
QA maturity and ownership
Coverage
UI, API, auth, data, and release flows
Automation
Framework, flaky tests, and CI signal
Roadmap
30/60/90 day execution plan
Output: a practical QA improvement report your team can use for planning, hiring, automation, and release readiness.
The problem
Testing feels expensive until production breaks
Most teams do not need more vague QA advice. They need a sharper view of what can fail, what is missing, and what to fix first.
Problem
Releases depend on manual confidence
Why it hurts
Important flows ship because someone thinks they checked enough, not because risk is visible.
What we check
Critical flows, release gates, manual bottlenecks, and regression ownership.
Problem
Automation exists but nobody trusts it
Why it hurts
Flaky tests slow the team down and make CI feel like noise instead of signal.
What we check
Framework structure, locator strategy, data setup, reporting, and failure triage.
Problem
API/auth/payment risks are missed
Why it hurts
UI-only testing misses contracts, permissions, state changes, and production failure modes.
What we check
API contracts, auth boundaries, payment/data paths, retries, idempotency, and error handling.
Problem
CI reports are noisy or ignored
Why it hurts
A red pipeline is not useful if nobody can tell what failed, why, or what to do next.
What we check
Report quality, smoke/regression split, ownership, quarantine rules, and release readiness notes.
Audit deliverables
What you get after the audit
A concrete report and execution plan, not a collection of abstract best practices.
QA maturity score
A clear snapshot of process, coverage, automation, CI, and release readiness.
Critical flow risk map
The user journeys, APIs, permissions, and data paths most likely to hurt production.
Missing test coverage report
Concrete UI, API, security, data, and reliability gaps your team can act on.
Automation framework review
Maintainability, flaky-test risks, locator strategy, test data, and suite structure.
CI/reporting improvement notes
How to make test results easier to trust, triage, and use for release decisions.
30/60/90 day QA roadmap
Prioritized next actions instead of a vague backlog of testing advice.
Sample report preview
QA Audit Report
A readable, prioritized summary for engineering, product, and QA leaders.
Mid-release sanity check
Want a second pair of QA eyes before the next release?
Packages
Productized support for the QA problem in front of you
No public pricing yet. Fixed-scope pricing is proposed after a short discovery call.
QA Audit Sprint
A prioritized QA improvement report and roadmap.
- QA process review
- UI/API risk map
- automation framework review
- CI/reporting review
- release-readiness notes
- 30/60/90 day roadmap
Automation Setup
A maintainable UI/API automation foundation.
- Playwright/Selenium setup
- API test framework
- smoke/regression structure
- CI pipeline
- reporting
- README and handover
QA Team Training
Your QA team practices stronger test design and API thinking.
- "How would you test..." workshops
- API testing scenarios
- automation review examples
- senior checklist thinking
- team exercises
QA Audit Sprint
fixed scope after discovery
Automation Setup
scoped by framework and CI needs
Team Training
priced by session/workshop
How it works
What happens after you request QA help
Calm, focused, and designed to produce decisions your team can act on.
You share product/team context
We run a short discovery call
You get a fixed-scope proposal
We deliver audit/setup/training
You receive roadmap or handover
Useful when quality risk is visible but hard to prioritize.
- SaaS teams preparing important releases
- startups without mature QA process
- teams with flaky automation
- products with API/auth/payment/data risks
- companies hiring or growing QA/SDET teams
Not for teams that only want checklist theatre.
- teams looking for cheap ticket clicking only
- companies wanting generic consulting slides
- projects without access to product/test context
Built from real QA/SDET practice
The same thinking behind What To Test, applied to your product.
The same thinking behind What To Test - risk-based scenarios, API contracts, auth and permission checks, automation review, and readiness scoring - is used to evaluate real product quality gaps.
API testing
Practical review grounded in scenarios, risks, and maintainable team habits.
UI automation
Practical review grounded in scenarios, risks, and maintainable team habits.
CI/reporting
Practical review grounded in scenarios, risks, and maintainable team habits.
auth and permissions
Practical review grounded in scenarios, risks, and maintainable team habits.
release risk
Practical review grounded in scenarios, risks, and maintainable team habits.
QA team coaching
Practical review grounded in scenarios, risks, and maintainable team habits.
Contact
Tell us what you want to improve
The request form opens in a popup when connected. There is no backend storage, no payments, and no account setup.
Next step
Ready to improve release confidence?
Request an audit, or explore the free QA practice product to see the scenario model behind the service.